Esata or firewire which is faster

There's one at Crunchgear. Community Bot 1. It acts the same as an internal drive. Which is a distinct advantage for eSATA. What does that mean? I have 80 people that I need to move one mile as fast as possible. My choices for vehicle are: a School bus, top speed 70 miles per hour a Lamborghini, that can do miles per hour So which do I choose? The "faster" one?

The point I am making is explained here Everett Everett 5, 20 20 silver badges 33 33 bronze badges. So far, this is just a critique of another answer, which is what comments are for. The point you make is good. How about expanding it into an actual answer? Uh no, this is a critique of the question, explaining why this kind of question is absurd. Again, as fixer states, a critique to the question must be commented in the question itself. The Overflow Blog.

Does ES6 make JavaScript frameworks obsolete? Podcast Do polyglots have an edge when it comes to mastering programming Featured on Meta. Now live: A fully responsive profile. Linked 2. Related Hot Network Questions. Now, the juice: USB 3. USB 3. This makes USB 3. Finally, USB 3. This potentially means more battery life out of laptops and other battery-based USB-supporting devices like cameras and mobile phones.

Of course, there are other factors to consider; the FireWire standard is also in the works and promises to allow 3. USB 2. It's hard to say whether USB 3. The 3. The test drive was daisy-chained to that enclosure for the Firewire test. See the Recommended Equipment and Photoshop Conclusions pages for hardware recommendations. A vintage 2.

It might also be that a different adapter card would perform differently. Even with eSATA running at slower speeds than its potential would allow, overall performance is still much higher than Firewire Firewire is 2.